Deals @ Amazon:
Decipher TextMessage for Mac [Download]Save your iPhone SMS text messages to your computer with Decipher TextMessage. Never lose important conversations again! Decipher TextMessage is so… Read More >
Adobe CS6 Design and Web Premium Student and Teacher Edition for Mac [Download]Adobe Creative Suite 6 Design & Web Premium Student and Teacher Edition software combines industry-leading tools for outstanding design in multiple me… Read More >
Decipher TextMessage [Download]Save your iPhone SMS text messages to your computer with Decipher TextMessage. Never lose important conversations again! Decipher TextMessage is so… Read More >
Learning To Build Apps For iPhone – iPad Training DVDNumber of Videos: 105 Lessons – 12.5 Hours DurationShips on: DVD-ROM
User Level: Beginners
Works On: Windows 7,Vista,XP- Mac OS X
iPhone Recovery StickThe iPhone Recovery Stick will easily recover deleted text messages,contacts, call history, even photos, voice notes and calendar entries.
Because o… Read More >
It’s a daunting task to compare Android and the iPhone simply
because there are so many Android smartphones. And yet, consumers
still want to know what makes them different.
It’s impossible to compare every Android smartphone against the
iPhone, but we’ve put together a comparison of some of the latest
Android smartphones (as of early 2011) and the current iPhone
model (iPhone 4).
Hardware
When comparing iPhone and Android smartphone hardware, it’s
actually easier to point out what the two phones lack compared to
the other. For instance, most Android displays are larger than
the iPhone 4′s screen. The Android standard seems to be
moving towards 4 inches and above, while the iPhone (for now)
remains at 3.5 inches.
However, the iPhone 4′s Retina Display technology still trumps
any Android phone’s screen resolution. With a pixel resolution of
960 by 640, the iPhone 4 features 330 pixels per inch of display.
The highest Android resolution is only 960 by 540 pixels spread
over 4.3 inches of screen, taking the total resolution down to
256 pixels per inch. In other words, the iPhone screen may be
smaller, but it’s still sharper.
Another important hardware comparison is the processor. The
iPhone 4 uses the Apple-designed A4 processor, which is quite
powerful, but starting to show its age. The newer Android
smartphones have a temporary edge because they use a new
generation of dual-core processors. That being said, they aren’t
that much faster than the A4, and Apple’s processor seems to keep
up quite nicely with current apps.
For those who love physical keyboards, there are options among
the many Android smartphones. But there’s no such option with the
iPhone.
In almost every other way, the hardware of Android smartphones
and iPhones differs only on a case-by-case basis. There’s
Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, accelerometers, proximity sensors, volume
controls, headphone jacks and more. Some Android phones also
include a few perks that aren’t appealing to all users, but are
nevertheless not present in the iPhone, including an HDMI port
and FM radio.
Android cameras are starting to provide more resolution (8
megapixels to the iPhone’s 5 megapixels) but image quality has
little to do with the resolution, so results vary by device.
Almost all phones are capable of recording 720p video as well,
and front-facing cameras for video chat are quickly becoming
standard. Even so, FaceTime for the iPhone still seems to be the
most user-friendly and reliable video chat platform.
Apple provides 16GB or 32GB of storage space in the iPhone,
whereas various Android phones can feature anywhere from 16GB to
48GB of
storage thanks to microSD cards (the iPhone doesn’t accept
any memory expansion).
Increasingly, the iPhone is falling behind in the 4G race. While
there are still only a handful of 4G capable Android phones, the
iPhone is lagging behind on the 3G networks. There’s also the
matter of the finicky antenna that caused much alarm when the
phone launched, but that seems to be less of an issue lately.
Finally, battery life for the iPhone is technically rated lower
than many of the latest Android phones, and yet still seems to
perform better in real-world situations. Apple has taken great
care in designing both the hardware and software in the iPhone to
use battery power as economically as possible. Even though many
Android smartphones have bigger batteries, they
struggle to keep up with the iPhone, especially the new 4G
phones.
Software
This is where the real comparisons can be made. Ultimately, the
battle of Android versus iPhone really has nothing to do with
hardware. It boils down to a competition between the Android and
iOS operating systems. And in that race, the
iPhone is still winning.
The current iPhone runs iOS 4, and most Android phones are
running Android 2.2 Froyo (with a few promising future upgrades
to 2.3 Gingerbread). The iPhone experience is standard across all
devices, whereas the open nature of Android has made it possible
for manufacturers to customize the Android interface on their
phones. There are valid arguments from both sides explaining why
this is both a good and bad idea. It allows customers to tweak
and customize their phone as much as they want, but it also
introduces fragmentation, compatibility issues and power
management problems. Ultimately, this is a matter of preference.
Would you like to treat your phone as your own and customize it
how you wish, or would you like the consistency and reliability
of Apples “walled garden”?
In many ways, the iPhone’s operating system has informed the
interface design of Android. Even though there are myriad
differences in how menus are displayed, the touch screen motions
and overall design is very reminiscent, so much so that users can
switch between the two and still find their way around.
Perhaps the single most important consideration is the apps for
each platform. While both Android and iOS are powerful, they are
really nothing without the hundreds of thousands of apps that can
do, well, just about anything. The iPhone is the clear
winner here, with well over 300,000 apps. Android got a late
start and has played an admirable game of catch-up, offering more
than 100,000 apps for Android devices.
And yet, even though the Android Market offers much the same
variety as the iPhone App Store, it’s widely accepted that the
iPhone still has a definitive lead in quality. Both stores have
the essentials, and both have useless junk, but overall the
iPhone apps are generally of higher quality across the board.
Android’s problems with fragmentation have also made it hard to
keep apps compatible with the dozens and dozens of phones with
various manufacturer skins and tweaks.
That doesn’t mean that Android is behind in all areas. Most
Android 2.2 devices are compatible with Adobe Flash, which is a
huge advantage for those who want to view the millions of videos,
animations and interactive websites on the Internet that require
it. The iPhone simply can’t view them. Of course, there are
trade-offs: Flash affects battery performance and security.
Another Android advantage is the notifications system. Even
die-hard Apple fans admit that the Apple notification system is
far too intrusive, especially when users are in the middle of
using an app. Android’s notification system is much more subtle
and easier to interact with. Android also has tighter integration
with Google services, including navigation, mail and docs.
Summary
It’s okay to be stumped by the decision between an Android
smartphone and the iPhone. They both have some incredible
features to recommend them and a few shortcomings to ponder
carefully. There’s no clear winner, so pick the features that you
want the most. Are apps most important? Battery life?
Customization options? 4G? Only then will you know if an iPhone
or an Android smartphone is right for you.
Microsoft Scoops Up Skype for $8.5 Billion, Coming to Windows
Phone, Outlook, and Kinect
How to Wipe Personal Data from Your Smartphone
How to Improve Android Smartphone Battery Life
© 2011 TechNewsDaily







Robert Evans



